Map the request path
Trace prompts, retrieved data, model calls, tools, outputs, identities and logs across the real production flow.
OutputA data and trust-boundary diagram with named owners.AI security engineering
Make the AI request path visible and defensible.
We map where prompts, retrieved data, tools and outputs travel, assess the production path against the OWASP GenAI LLM Top 10 2026, and implement one prioritized control inside your environment.
The security loop
Map. Assess. Remediate.
A framework name is only useful when every finding points to evidence, an owner and a control that can be retested.
Assess applicable risks
Review the path against the OWASP GenAI LLM Top 10 2026 and test the controls that should contain each relevant failure.
OutputEvidence attached to every applicable finding, not a generic checklist tick.Fix and retest
Implement one prioritized guardrail, permission, redaction or output-handling change and test the path again.
OutputA versioned remediation record with open, mitigated and accepted risks.The report
Evidence, ownership and retest status.
The output is designed for engineering and risk teams to work from after we leave, with the framework release and assessment date stated explicitly.
- 01AI system and data-flow map
Models, retrieval stores, tools, identities, external calls and the points where sensitive data crosses a boundary.
- 02Versioned findings register
Framework version, affected path, evidence, exposure, owner, remediation priority and acceptance criteria.
- 03Control implementation
One agreed change built in your environment, such as redaction, least-privilege tool access, output validation or an approval gate.
- 04Retest and handover
Status after remediation, residual risk, runbook and the checks your team should repeat when the system changes.
Straight answers
The questions buyers actually ask.
The assessment traces prompts, retrieved data, model calls, tools, identities, outputs and logs across one production path, then evaluates the applicable risks and existing controls against the OWASP GenAI LLM Top 10 2026.
No. It is a scoped engineering assessment and remediation record, not a penetration test, compliance opinion or certification. The report states the framework version, assessment date, scope and exclusions.
You receive a system and data-flow map plus a versioned findings register. Each applicable finding records evidence, exposure, owner, remediation priority, acceptance criteria, residual risk and retest status.
One production path. Ten days. Findings you can act on.
Put evidence behind your AI security review.
Bring one AI feature and the people who own its application, data and risk decisions. We will map it, assess it, implement one priority control and leave the findings register with your team.